I don't mind either way on this topic, except to say that we need to create
clean and nice public pages. What ever makes that easier seems logical,
but since
I have not done it with either of the two wiki's I can't add more than
this to
the discussion
Carl.
Robert Greig wrote:
On 22/09/06, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I voted MoinMoin because I've used it before and liked it, I don't know
much about confluence.
I did a lot of the legwork in rolling out Confluence within JPMC (our
instance currently has over 4000 registered users, none of whom was
forced to use it by any corporate diktats so it's been popular with
developers).
I have done some searches to read about the feature set of MoinMoin
and to be honest I think there is not really very much in terms of
core functionality to differentiate them. If you like MoinMoin I can
pretty much guarantee you will like Confluence.
I would say that from the sites I have seen, Confluence can generate
more attractive sites - whether this is because the defaults are
better with Confluence or because it is easier to customise I don't
know. The attractiveness of the site is less important for our basic
collaboration but is obviously extremely important for the static site
which may be people's first contact point with Qpid.
RG
