Hi, I think we should use ant for M1. M2 is not too far to go with Maven. +1 for ant build for M1.
Regards, Bhupendra Bhardwaj On 11/14/06, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't put words in my mouth, Robert. I don't think I need to; you seem to have plenty already. > Nowhere do I say that Apache > guidelines require maven. I was saying that releases in the incubator > are intended to show that the project has a viable and diverse > community, and that that community knows the rules and regulations > required for releases. And in the context of your email I read that as implying that maven was part of that. Maybe that was a misinterpretation but it certainly read like that to me. > I didn't say it was a barrier. I said, and have been saying for > weeks, that doing the work twice, once in ant and again in maven, is > pointless. We are talking about a very small amount of modification to the ant build system in order to get a release out there. It is the maven work that seems to have been weeks of effort. RG
