Dusan Zatkovsky wrote: > Hi there. > > What's the current status of jambi 4.6 and it build process? > As you can see from the recent posts we are now in a state where we are able to compile everything. Have done some preliminary tests on our main product (Pharos), and it seems to be working quite as under 4.5. Haven't done any tests on Windows yet, though. The major unmapped missing piece in 4.6 seems to be the new gesture stuff, please fill me inn Eskil if you know some more things that ought to be done. > I am asking because I have a idea to make qtjambi more attractive for java > developers - for example to mavenize and publish it to some official/custom > repo. I have made some maven stuff (*1) about qtjambi for my personal use, > but it should be fine to share my work with other developers. > Good to hear! Should be possible to do something here, especially if the community are able to build binary releases for Linux and Windows at least. These should come in both 32 and 64bit versions. Do anyone out there have Macs to test on? It also depends if someone have access to some build server that we could use for trying to setup the official build process. Would be nice if the Nokia people could setup such a playground for the community since the continuation of this Qt Jambi should gives Nokia some free publicity on Qt as a product.
Anyway, I've been trying a couple of times to get in touch with the codehaus people, but I haven't had heard anything from them so far, so I guess they're not interested in this project. > *1 Our projects are using maven, so I mavenized libs ( for 4 platforms > [win/lib/32/64] ), I have created maven plugin (*2) and new maven archetype > for qtjambi > > > *2 I know that there is juic-maven-plugin, but my idea is to provide all-in > one plugin which will doesn't need any external stuff ( downloading qtjambi, > setting path to juic,lupdate and lrelease, ... ) > Ok, that would be really great. Looking forward to see that in the repos! Just use the git repos on gitorious to commit to, works OK for me (after some fiddeling with git). Helge _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
