> Dusan Zatkovsky wrote: > > Hi there. > > > > What's the current status of jambi 4.6 and it build process? > > As you can see from the recent posts we are now in a state > where we are able to compile everything. Have done > some preliminary tests on our main product (Pharos), and it > seems to be working quite as under 4.5. Haven't done any tests > on Windows yet, though. The major unmapped missing piece in > 4.6 seems to be the new gesture stuff, please fill me inn Eskil > if you know some more things that ought to be done. > > > I am asking because I have a idea to make qtjambi more attractive for > > java developers - for example to mavenize and publish it to some > > official/custom repo. I have made some maven stuff (*1) about qtjambi for > > my personal use, but it should be fine to share my work with other > > developers. > > Good to hear! Should be possible to do something here, especially > if the community are able to build binary releases for Linux > and Windows at least. These should come in both 32 and 64bit > versions. Do anyone out there have Macs to test on? It also depends > if someone have access to some build server that we could use for > trying to setup the official build process. Would be nice if the Nokia > people could setup such a playground for the community since the > continuation of this Qt Jambi should gives Nokia some free publicity > on Qt as a product. I have a Hudson server that is not used in the night (at least, not heavily used). I can program the building of qt jambi at midnight. I only need some instruction to setup the build. Also I have a Nexus server that I can use to sync with a central maven repository. > > Anyway, I've been trying a couple of times to get in touch with > the codehaus people, but I haven't had heard anything from them > so far, so I guess they're not interested in this project. > > > *1 Our projects are using maven, so I mavenized libs ( for 4 platforms > > [win/lib/32/64] ), I have created maven plugin (*2) and new maven > > archetype for qtjambi > > > > > > *2 I know that there is juic-maven-plugin, but my idea is to provide > > all-in one plugin which will doesn't need any external stuff ( > > downloading qtjambi, setting path to juic,lupdate and lrelease, ... ) > > Ok, that would be really great. Looking forward to see that in the > repos! Just use the git repos on gitorious to commit to, works OK > for me (after some fiddeling with git). > > Helge > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest > _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
Re: [Qt-jambi-interest] Current status of 4.6 build process?
José Arcángel Salazar Delgado Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:17:35 -0800
- [Qt-jambi-interest] Current status of 4.6 ... Dusan Zatkovsky
- Re: [Qt-jambi-interest] Current statu... Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
- Re: [Qt-jambi-interest] Current statu... Helge Fredriksen
- Re: [Qt-jambi-interest] Current s... José Arcángel Salazar Delgado
- Re: [Qt-jambi-interest] Curre... José Arcángel Salazar Delgado
- Re: [Qt-jambi-interest] C... Dusan Zatkovsky
- Re: [Qt-jambi-intere... Helge Fredriksen
- Re: [Qt-jambi-in... Dusan Zatkovsky
- Re: [Qt-jamb... José Arcángel Salazar Delgado
