> Dusan Zatkovsky wrote:
> > Hi there.
> >
> > What's the current status of jambi 4.6 and it build process?
> 
> As you can see from the recent posts we are now in a state
> where we are able to compile everything. Have done
> some preliminary tests on our main product (Pharos), and it
> seems to be working quite as under 4.5. Haven't done any tests
> on Windows yet, though. The major unmapped missing piece in
> 4.6 seems to be the new gesture stuff, please fill me inn Eskil
> if you know some more things that ought to be done.
> 
> > I am asking because I have a idea to make qtjambi more attractive for
> > java developers - for example to mavenize and publish it to some
> > official/custom repo. I have made some maven stuff (*1) about qtjambi for
> > my personal use, but it should be fine to share my work with other
> > developers.
> 
> Good to hear! Should be possible to do something here, especially
> if the community are able to build binary releases for Linux
> and Windows at least. These should come in both 32 and 64bit
> versions. Do anyone out there have Macs to test on? It also depends
> if someone have access to some build server that we could use for
> trying to setup the official build process. Would be nice if the Nokia
> people could setup such a playground for the community since the
> continuation of this Qt Jambi should gives Nokia some free publicity
> on Qt as a product.
I have a Hudson server that is not used in the night (at least, not heavily 
used). I can program the building of qt jambi at midnight. I only need some 
instruction to setup the build. Also I have a Nexus server that I can use to 
sync with a central maven repository.
> 
> Anyway, I've been trying a couple of times to get in touch with
> the codehaus people, but I haven't had heard anything from them
> so far, so I guess they're not interested in this project.
> 
> > *1 Our projects are using maven, so I mavenized libs ( for 4 platforms
> > [win/lib/32/64] ), I have created maven plugin (*2) and new maven
> > archetype for qtjambi
> >
> >
> > *2 I know that there is juic-maven-plugin, but my idea is to provide
> > all-in one plugin which will doesn't need any external stuff (
> > downloading qtjambi, setting path to juic,lupdate and lrelease, ... )
> 
> Ok, that would be really great. Looking forward to see that in the
> repos! Just use the git repos on gitorious to commit to, works OK
> for me (after some fiddeling with git).
> 
> Helge
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
> 
_______________________________________________
Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest

Reply via email to