On Friday, 2 de September de 2011 21:02:15 Richard Moore wrote:
> TBH it seems to me that is is too much stuff for QtBase, a javascript
> interpreter??!. Base implies a minimal set. For example, I'd expect to
> be able to use qtbase to build a daemon for a headless server. I'm
> thinking core stuff like QCoreApplication, QString possibly even the
> networking modules.
> 
> Right now we don't have a forum to discuss this properly, so this list
> appears to be the best we've got.

I'm in agreement. I wouldn't mind a JS interpreter in the base modules, 
provided it worked everywhere. That was QtScript between 4.3 and 4.6. With 
JSC, supporting it in multiple architectures became a maintenance burden, but 
doable. With V8 it looks very daunting.

I don't mind it being inside QtBase, but we can't depend on it.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Qt5-feedback mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback

Reply via email to