On Saturday, 3 de September de 2011 01:18:26 Konstantin Ritt wrote: > this is something that doesn't fit into the idea of replacing > QRegExp's custom engine with V8's one (or did I misunderstood > something?).
This is why I started the thread in the first place: Lars and I had discussed
the idea of using V8's RE engine to replace QRegExp. But after investigating
V8, I came to the conclusion that this idea was not acceptable.
The advantage of that would be that the C++ and QML sides of Qt would have
access to the same RE syntax. And we wouldn't need two RE engines in memory.
PCRE looks more likely to be the replacement for QRegExp.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
