2011/9/2 Kent Hansen <[email protected]>: > (What's up with this list blocking my emails? _Third_ try...) > > Den 01. sep. 2011 16:52, skrev ext Thiago Macieira: >> On Thursday, 1 de September de 2011 15:09:27 [email protected] wrote: >>>> It doesn't and that's the problem. The ARM simulator is supported right >>>> now on >>>> i386 only. Not even x86-64 is supported. See above. >>> Hmmm... I didn't know that. I thought it was generic C++ code interpreting >>> ARM instructions. Kent, can you have a look? >> It is. The problem is that the ARM instructions are 32-bit, so they can't >> reference the entire 64-bit address space. E.g.: >> >> src/3rdparty/v8/src/arm/assembler-arm-inl.h:254:49: error: cast from >> 'v8::internal::Address' to 'int32_t' loses precision [-fpermissive] >> >> > From that i can think of the possibilities: > [...] > > Great summary. > Option 2 seems the most reasonable/low-effort to me, as MIPS64 is > already an established architecture, and it doesn't differ much from > MIPS32, as you pointed out. I created > http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1655 and sent a mail to the > main MIPS/V8 guy, let's see what they say. > > Wish I could contribute, as I know MIPS32/64 quite well :( We do have > collaborators at Szeged university who have V8 commit rights and can > help us with this type of thing. > > Kent > _______________________________________________ > Qt5-feedback mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback >
appeared 3 times so far :) _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
