On Sunday 18 September 2011 01:48:12 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Saturday, 17 de September de 2011 22:13:08 David Faure wrote: > > That's my question to this list :-)) > > Actually, thinking about it, I have one idea: > > appending /libexec to every entry in LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > Would that work? > > That would get you /usr/lib/libexec, which is neither what we have nor what > the FHS recommends.
Well OK, appending /Qt/libexec to every entry in LD_LIBRARY_PATH (plus default library paths like /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 somehow...) > I meant if a 64-bit library (/usr/lib64/libfoo) can use a 32-bit helper > application (/usr/lib/foo/libexec/bar). Or to put it simply: where should > the 64-bit helper be installed: /usr/lib or /usr/lib64? I would say it should be in the same place as the library. But that in turn leads to the question of how to know where the library is :-) I am a bit surprised that all this isn't already specified anywhere. Well, probably because individual apps just like into their install prefix, while we're aiming for something more generic here. -- David Faure, [email protected], http://www.davidfaure.fr Sponsored by Nokia to work on KDE, incl. Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org). _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
