On 2011-09-17, David Faure <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Debian and friends uses more or less /usr/lib/NAME/libexec >> > where as fedora and friends uses /usr/libexec/NAME/ > > What's NAME there? The package name, in order to split up the helper binaries > from different packages? > Do we really need this? After all /usr/bin has no such split.
NAME there could be package name, but it could also be all sorts of other things, like 'kde4'. And yes, we need such a split to be sure to avoid clashes. Then several libraries can have their own 'domagic' helper executable. We have enough issues with avoiding clashes within /usr/bin. /Sune _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
