On Monday, 26 de September de 2011 13:13:09 [email protected] wrote: > Thiago wrote: > > So I'd consolidate the list as: > > Linux x86 32-bit, X11 & Wayland > > Linux x86-64, X11 & Wayland > > Linux ARMv7, X11 & Wayland > > (maybe dropping X11 support for ARM) > > This list aims to be specific enough to describe what actually would run in > the continuous integration system, hence it mentions Ubuntu. In the > release documentation or product documentation, we should be more generic, > "extrapolate", and include the other non-reference platforms that have been > verified.
I think that's doing it the other way around. The release documentation should
list exactly where it was tested, but the reference platforms should be
generic enough.
For example, if someone writes a feature that compiles on Ubuntu but fails to
compile on Fedora, it's still in need of fixing. Such errors would be usually
cases of depending on undefined or buggy behaviour in one of the libraries
installed or of the compiler, so they should thankfully be quite rare.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
