Rohan wrote: > I have some comments on the target platforms. > > On all platforms, Open GL (ES) 2.0 is required. > linux-x86-32-gcc-x11 Ubuntu Linux 10.04 ×86 32 bit, X11 > linux-x86-64-gcc-x11 Ubuntu Linux 10.04 ×86 64 bit, X11 > linux-x86-32-gcc-wayland Linux Ubuntu 10.04 ×86 32-bit, Wayland
> I think that Ubuntu 10.04 maybe too old already. The Mesa version shipped > on that Ubuntu can't do GLES2.0 AFAIK. Also I think there is no wayland > compositor available out-of-the-box. In other words, to actually test Qt5 > with wayland and GLES2.0 on Ubuntu 10.04, you probably have to change the > environment to the point where it's no longer accurate to call it "Ubuntu > 10.04". > We already plan to test with Ubuntu 11.10 in CI, so the question is whether > or not 10.04 should be kept as well. Probably not. I updated the table for now along these lines. Thiago, Craig: if we later agree to use something LSB based, let's then update this. I changed the headings of the table to indicate that we're specifying the CI system configuration, rather than the reference platform, that might indeed be a bit more abstract and general.. > linux-arm7-gcc-wayland Linux, ARM7, Wayland gcc 4.5 ? > > The platform must be specified more completely. Right now it specifies that > the kernel is Linux, CPU is ARMv7, "wayland" is used somehow and gcc 4.5 > may be used. There's a lot of gaps to be filled in :) We should find some > existing platform which fits these specs, and specify that as the target > instead. If such a thing doesn't exist then I guess we shouldn't target it. It'd be good to find a configuration in the CI for this. I documented that we need to specify this in more detail. > osx-10.7-64 Apple Mac OS X 10.7 “Lion” Cocoa 64 bit > osx-10.6-64 Apple Mac OS X 10.6 “Snow Leopard” Cocoa 64 bit > osx-10.6-32 Apple Mac OS X 10.6 “Snow Leopard” Cocoa 32 bit > > Out of the listed platforms, Macs are the most expensive and least reliable > for CI purposes, so it would be really great if we could cut these down a bit. > At least testing 32-bit OSX 10.6 in CI is probably a waste (?) I would like > to go > even further and do Qt 5.0 CI with OSX >= 10.7 only. Older OSX could still > have some release testing if it's perceived as valuable. It would indeed be good to keep the list of reference configurations shorter. I moved 10.6 to the second table (platforms we would like to support). (Well, I believe Tier 1 has been so far defined to be included in the CI, but anyways.) Best regards, Henry _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
