I enjoyed read your response John.  I know that we both know people  who are 
sick and being cared for by their medical doctors.  They feel the  need to be 
recognized as disabled.
 
There is a small segment in the population that seem to survive well  
considering physical and mental limitations and they too consider themselves as 
 
disAbled.
 
There are those with the plates and placards you and I see parking in  
"those" spots and running to be the first in line for movie tickets or a  
shopping 
cart.
 
After awhile ya gotta shake your head and wonder, who is and who  isn't.......
Best Wishes
 
 
In a message dated 7/28/2008 12:00:02 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
A federal court judge is who makes those weird calls and begins a  precident 
under which more ugly people stop working and get money.  
john  



-----  Original Message ----
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, July  26, 2008 2:25:56 PM
Subject: [QUAD-L] Court: disability laws protect those  unable to have sex

By the way.... what is a disabled person?  Who makes that  judgement?
What is a person with a disability and who makes that judgement?
 
Do doctors make the judgement?  Does CMS make that call?  Does  the license 
bureau declare by issuing special license plates and  placards?  Who is a 
single source responsible for passing judgement and  making that call?  
 
Certainly, not me.
W
 
 
In a message dated 7/26/2008 12:29:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
I knew this would happen. now any company that hires a fridged  secretary can 
say they hire handicapped people. Don't forget to give them a  parking 
permitt so their genitals don't fall off in the parking lot. When I  started 
seeing 
fat people being listed as handicapped I knew this crap  was on the way. As 
soon as anyone at work mentons her handicap shes back in  court for sexual 
harrassment. Our legal system has turned stupidity into an  artform. Our 
schools 
have made it mandatory, and our politicians are the  poster children. Next year 
all ugly people will be called handicapped. I'll  be double dipping.
 
john


-----  Original Message ----
From: Eric W Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:  [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 11:38:34  AM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Court: disability laws protect those unable to  have sex

see if this works

Eric W Rudd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 






 
_http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/5902097.html_ 
(http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/5902097.html)  

Court: disability  laws protect those unable to have sex  
Mcclatchy-tribune  
WASHINGTON — A  South Carolina breast-cancer survivor has beaten the State 
Department  and  
convinced judges  in Washington that the inability to have sex is a 
disability protected  under federal  
anti-discrimination laws.  

The new  appellate-court ruling gives Piedmont, S.C., resident Kathy E. Adams 
 another potential shot  
at serving  overseas. More broadly, the ruling cracks open the courtroom door 
for  additional legal  
challenges by  those who are sexually incapacitated.  

"I think it's a  major victory for former cancer patients, and for anyone who 
has had their  sex life disrupted," Adams' attorney, David H.  
Shapiro, said  Tuesday.  

Adams wants to  compel the State Department to hire her as a foreign service 
officer and  provide back pay. She'll now go before a jury and  
trial judge,  unless the State Department relents first.  

In its 2-1  decision, issued Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 
District of  Columbia Circuit ruled that Adams has a case against the  State  
Department. Most  significantly, the D.C. circuit court ruled for its first 
time that laws  that protect people with disabilities from discrimination  
cover "sexual  relations." The ruling overturns a trial judge who'd dismissed 
Adams'  case.  

"At the risk of  stating the obvious, sex is unquestionably a significant 
human activity,  one our species has been engaging in at least since the  
biblical  injunction to 'be fruitful and multiply,' " appellate Judge David 
Tatel  wrote.  

Tatel concluded  that sex is the kind of "major life activity" that Congress 
considered  when it passed the Rehabilitation Act in 1973. The law,  
like the  better-known Americans with Disabilities Act, prohibits 
discrimination  against people with disabilities.  

Lawmakers defined  a disability as an impairment that "substantially limits" 
a major life  activity. Courts still struggle to explain what that  
means. Last week,  for instance, the D.C. appellate court determined that 
"sleeping" is a  protected major life activity.  

Walking, seeing  and hearing, among many other activities, likewise have been 
identified as  "major."  

The new ruling  comes from what's sometimes called the nation's 
second-highest court,  meaning that many lawyers will be parsing its words.  

"As a basic  physiological act practiced regularly by a vast portion of the 
population,  a cornerstone of family and marital life, a conduit to  
emotional and  spiritual fulfillment, and a crucial element in intimate 
relationships,  sex easily qualifies as a major life activity," Tatel  wrote.  

A State  Department spokeswoman said the department was still reviewing the  
decision.  

Adams couldn't be  reached for comment Tuesday.  

The  Russian-speaking Adams aced the State Department's Foreign Service 
written  and oral exams in 2002, ranking seventh out of 200  
candidates.  Living about 15 miles south of Greenville, she was in line to 
start  training in January 2004.  

Before her  training started, doctors diagnosed her with breast cancer. She 
underwent  surgery, but the State Department subsequently denied her entry into 
 the Foreign Service.  

"The department  could not guarantee (her) access to the required medical 
follow-up and  surveillance at all overseas assignments," a State  
Department nurse  testified.  

State Department  officials added, and the dissenting appellate judge agreed, 
that the  department didn't know about Adams' sexual disability  
when it declined  to hire her. The court majority, however, reasoned that "it 
makes no  difference whether an employer has precise knowledge  
of an employee's  substantial limitation" so long as the employer knows about 
the  impairment.  

In this case, the  State Department knew about Adams' breast cancer but 
didn't know how the  cancer treatments impaired her sex life.  
Adams underwent a  mastectomy, had her ovaries and fallopian tubes removed, 
gained weight and  felt her libido wither.  

"I now find that  the prospect of dating and developing an intimate 
relationship is just too  painful and frightening," Adams, who is single,  
stated in a  declaration.  














 
____________________________________
 Get fantasy football with free live scoring. _Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy 
Football  today_ 
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) .









**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for 
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)

Reply via email to