> On 29 May 2015, at 09:12, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > > If most people do prefer one-daemon for all VRFs, and want that in now > without thinking about how it might work with multi-daemon in the future, > then sure, I'll stop being awkward.
I just want to make sure I've been following this email chain correctly. It seems that there is at least some consensus for a single daemon for all VRFs. Does this preclude a thread per VRF within the daemon? Michael _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
