On Fri, 29 May 2015, Michael H Lambert wrote:
I just want to make sure I've been following this email chain correctly.
It seems that there is at least some consensus for a single daemon for
all VRFs. Does this preclude a thread per VRF within the daemon?
generally, no.
For existing Quagga libzebra daemons, probably that's going to be such a
long effort to achieve, that there will be significant risks as to whether
it can succeed. Multi-daemon would be much easier I suspect (it's not like
VRF instances need to share any data, so there's no memory/performance
trade-off issues that would generally give threads any benefit over
multi-process - unlike multi-processing bgpd).
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
You can fool all the people all of the time if the advertising is right
and the budget is big enough.
-- Joseph E. Levine
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
