On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Donald Sharp wrote:
I think any model we come up with needs to bear in mind that we need to get
the backlog reduced to a reasonable level and to figure out a methodology
that we can be a bit more agile(for lack of a better word) in moving
forward.
So, a thought in my mind over a few of these emails now:
- The focus in some of these emails on who should be a "maintainer", and
whether Donald should be selected as one, is sort of putting the cart
before the horse.
(I've no quibbles with Donald! )
- The primary question is: What should the development process be?
We should figure the latter out first, before assigning people to roles.
We can't know the required roles without knowing the process.
E.g., the rounds-based process of the last couple of months to me suggests
having a person in a secretarial/administrative role to support that. One
that is more a chore than anything else, and could/should be rotated
around.
So what should the process be - without reference to specific people? Then
the roles. Then the specifics on people.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Graduate life: It's not just a job. It's an indenture.
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
