> > Oh, and 1 and 2 are probably somewhat conditional on: > > 0. What is the right^Wbest^Wleast worst model? > > 1. What should be the role/responsibilities of those with commit access? >> >> - code review submitted patches to provide feedback - coordinate the release schedule - help contributors of quagga coordinate on feature development to avoid wasting cycles where two groups develop the same feature (ospf unnumbered comes to mind) - commit patches - help build the community of users and developers
> 2. How should that role be assigned? >> > +1 to Martin's suggestion of letting the community decide (everyone gets a vote, not just the maintainers). I do not think it needs to be super formal. If someone thinks John/Jane Doe should be maintainer they send an email to quagga-dev suggesting so and let the discussion go from there. Daniel
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
