I can modify this patch down to 1 second. No problem. donald
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Donald Sharp wrote: > > Do we agree that 10s is a far more reasonable value that 120s? >> > > Even 10s smells high these days. I'd go for 5s, even 1s. > > If there are problems in terms of dependencies between different events, > let's make it a guiding principle of Quagga to try explicitly signal those > events and have others act on those, as much as possible - rather than punt > things to operators with static, "introduces needless delays when it does > fix the problem; and doesn't fix the problem otherwise" timeouts otherwise. > > (And yes, some stuff may turn out to really, really difficult to detect > and/or describe, but let's at least try before giving up ;) ). > > regards, > -- > Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A > Fortune: > Anoint, v.: > To grease a king or other great functionary already sufficiently > slippery. > -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
