Lou - You are correct, I jumped the gun a little bit. We need to provide time for people to vote on the document.. Please take the time to read the document and let us know how you would like to proceed.
Additionally I'll move the CE part back to the Quagga Release Process docuemnt. thanks! donald On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul, > > While the conclusion to work on ce may (or may not, I wasn't on the call for > this) be premature, why can't a branch just be added under the existing repo > if/when that's the consensus among the community? > > Lou > > > > On June 22, 2016 5:53:34 AM Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Donald Sharp wrote: >> >>> Discussion on where to do the work next. quagga-ce on github or on a >>> branch in Savannah. Decision was to start immediately working on a CE >>> branch on github. >> >> >> You need to change the name though. >> >> regards, >> -- >> Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A >> Fortune: >> Getting the job done is no excuse for not following the rules. >> >> Corollary: >> Following the rules will not get the job done. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Quagga-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
