I think this is a succinct conveyance of my concerns. I'd like to add one more:
I would like to have the ability to have dispute resolution handled in a timely fashion. It should be measured in weeks not months. donald On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul, > > On 6/24/2016 10:51 AM, Paul Jakma wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Lou Berger wrote: >> >>> I think this goes to the root of the recent discussions: >> Oh, and while that might go to the root of some discussion, what caused >> those discussions? > > I can only speak to what's motivated my participation in this > discussion. I think the root issues I'd like to see addressed are: > 1. no ability to predict when the next release with *any* fixes will be > available > 2. lack of an active (rolling) development/integration master branch > 3. lack of visibility and transparency in the integration and release > process > > I probably wouldn't have cared enough to speak up on 3 if 1 and 2 > weren't issues. > > I think there a slew of other issues that stem from / will be solved by > addressing the above , e.g., duplicate patches, painful/repeated > rebases, and late discovery of issues. > > Lou > >> regards, > > _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
