Hi Donald,
I'm sorry I couldn't stay for the rest of the meeting. I really think the
roles discussion is separable from the release cycle discussion and it
would be good to close the roles discussion first.
Lou
On June 21, 2016 11:01:45 AM Donald Sharp <[email protected]> wrote:
Discussion of the Quagga Maintainers Document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19DZcT0cJUSYxVIFenHvGFhLLUmLTRFHuMNZcI7aUNGA/edit?usp=sharing
The document is updated to reflect the discussion/decisions in this
meeting. The highlights of the discussion:
1) Maintainer per protocol. This is maintained in a MAINTAINER document
2) Different branches per protocol. This was deemed to high cost.
Limit to one development branch
3) Counter proposal from Vincent to have stricter roles and git only
committers. Community is not large enough yet to move to this
methodology.
4) Added a section on Sabbatical/extended leave
5) 6 months inactivity to remove
6) Violation of trust/Role - Resolved through current maintainers.
This document was approved for moving forward with
Discussion on where to do the work next. quagga-ce on github or on a
branch in Savannah. Decision was to start immediately working
on a CE branch on github.
donald
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
