On 6/22/2016 6:17 PM, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote: > >> For example, assume I want to push the new feature that I have been working >> on: MTR-OSPF (RFC4915). Having that in the CE (thing ;) ) for a few cycles >> might help us understand its impact on users or whether it is worthy to be >> added to the main release or not. I really think there is a value there. > Oh, there might well be value in having staging areas for experimental > features.
why not just use personal github for this? that said,there might be value in having an easy way to see the features in development... Lou > Though, let me warn people in advance, if some patch set is somehow not > ready to go in to master but needs proving or something, regular > rebasing may be a fact of life. I've had to carry stuff for ages before > I could prove it (and accused of pushing stuff in too fast by other > maintainers for it!). I've abandoned plenty of stuff too, including > because I just couldn't keep up with other changes. > > regards, _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
