On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Lou Berger wrote:

While the conclusion to work on ce may (or may not, I wasn't on the call for this) be premature, why can't a branch just be added under the existing repo if/when that's the consensus among the community?

What is the status of this CE thing relative to master? Is it a relatively ephemeral (content wise) that generally acts as a staging tree for integration? Or is it something else?

Jafar mentioned issues there - they need to be resolved.

If CE is meant to be some way to get around the fact that some patches in the backlog have review comments outstanding; and the contributor concerned thinks it easier to engineer a crisis than just engage with review comments and address them via revisions and/or persuasion, then, sorry, no.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
Ed Sullivan will be around as long as someone else has talent.
                -- Fred Allen

_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to