On 6/23/2016 1:46 AM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote: > On 6/22/2016 6:04 PM, Lou Berger wrote: >> why not just use personal github for this? that said,there might be >> value in having an easy way to see the features in development... > I do use github for this, as many of us probably do. At some point we > want this to go into the Quagga. Even if everyone agrees that some > feature/patch should go in, having it in CE several months or even > more before moving it to the "standard/YE" release allows a period of > feedback and bug fixes related to the feature by users who want to try > or need the new feature without impacting the users who prefer less > "distributive" or slower changes. Having a faster path to an integrated development mainline is certainly one of my "hot button" issues that I think is critical to be solved.
Why comment was in the context of Paul's statement: > Oh, there might well be value in having staging areas for experimental > features. I didn't read this as an CE or anything other than separate feature development branch... Lou > --Jafar > _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
