Paul,
Independent of branches/release discussion, my view is that either
version of the roles documents - either Vincent's or the one posted for
yesterday's meeting - would really help to _just get it done_. (of
course, I am not maintainer nor do I expect to be one in the future.)
It would be good to get your input into these discussions, as based on
reading the list it seems there is general agreement that the status quo
needs to change.
Thanks,
Lou
On 6/22/2016 6:51 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Paul Jakma wrote:
>
>> If CE is meant to be some way to get around the fact that some patches
>> in the backlog have review comments outstanding; and the contributor
>> concerned thinks it easier to engineer a crisis than just engage with
>> review comments and address them via revisions and/or persuasion,
>> then, sorry, no.
> A much better way forward is to just roll up the sleeves, and get the
> nits addressed, and do the (trial) rebases to see what depends on what
> and what can easily be triaged ahead and gotten in.
>
> This isn't rocket science. Integration work (review, nits, reconciling,
> etc.) can be very tedious - esp when lots of it has built up in
> different directions.
>
> However, the best answer to such a problem is to _just get it done_.
>
> regards,
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
