Looks like I'm going now :-) - we can discuss further then, in the mean time Mani and I will try to get something up and running on the CloudBees CI instances.
Cheers, Martijn On 19 January 2015 at 17:34, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sadly I may not be able to make FOSDEM, still trying to wrangle some > clever ways to make it. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 19 January 2015 at 17:33, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> >> On 19/01/2015 17:28, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >> Hi Rory, >> >> Understood - it will be good to be able to encourage various OpenJDK >> members to contribute / port tests into it and measure that. Small steps >> :-). >> >> Sounds good Martijn, talk more on this at FOSDEM ? >> >> Rgds,Rory >> >> >> On 19 January 2015 at 16:35, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 19/01/2015 15:36, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rory, >>> >>> Thanks - we're looking into the existing Cloudbees Jenkins instance to >>> do this. >>> >>> ok >>> >>> A second question quick question - do the numbers we're publishing >>> look right compared to your internal ones? >>> >>> Appreciate non OpenJDK tests run by Oracle means that they cover >>> more. >>> >>> Comparing our internal numbers with yours would be like comparing >>> apples with pears >>> I'm afraid. >>> >>> Rgds,Rory >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 19 January 2015 at 15:18, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 19/01/2015 10:55, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> John Oliver and Mani Sarkar spent some time on the most recent Adopt >>>>> OpenJDK hackday and managed to get what looks like to be meaningful code >>>>> coverage numbers for OpenJDK using the jcov/jtreg tools: >>>>> >>>>> Results for jdk9: http://sticky.uwcs.co.uk/jcov/ >>>>> >>>>> ========Code Tools Dev======== >>>>> >>>>> The configuration John used was as follows (is this the correct usage >>>>> pattern?): >>>>> >>>>> Build jdk images >>>>> install jtreg with the jcov >>>>> >>>>> export the normal vars: >>>>> >>>>> ``` >>>>> export SOURCE_CODE=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/ >>>>> export JTREG_INSTALL=/home/joliver/workspace/jtreg >>>>> export JT_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL >>>>> export JTREG_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL >>>>> export >>>>> PRODUCT_HOME=$SOURCE_CODE/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/images/jdk >>>>> >>>>> export JPRT_JTREG_HOME=${JT_HOME} >>>>> export JPRT_JAVA_HOME=${PRODUCT_HOME} >>>>> export JTREG_TIMEOUT_FACTOR=5 >>>>> export CONCURRENCY=8 >>>>> ``` >>>>> >>>>> cd into jdk/test >>>>> >>>>> edit the Makefile and add the following: >>>>> >>>>> ``` >>>>> jdkroot=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/ >>>>> >>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += >>>>> -jcov/classes:$(jdkroot)/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk/modules/java.base >>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += >>>>> -jcov/source:$(jdkroot)/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes >>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += -jcov/include:* >>>>> ``` >>>>> >>>>> just before the line: # Make sure jtreg exists >>>>> >>>>> then just run "make test" inside the root >>>>> >>>>> =======Quality Discuss======= >>>>> >>>> Hi Martijn, >>>> >>>> Posting the results on our wiki won't work, so I can provide a link to >>>> the >>>> results. Let me know when you have decided on the link locations. >>>> >>>> Rgds,Rory >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is this something that could be hosted by the quality group for the >>>>> major OpenJDK code lines (7u, 8u and jdk9)? >>>>> >>>>> If not then the Adoption Group can host it on one of their external >>>>> servers temporarily and we could link to that from the wiki(s)/project >>>>> page(s). >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Martijn >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>>> Quality Engineering Manager >>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>> Quality Engineering Manager >>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >> Quality Engineering Manager >> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >> >> >
