On 26/01/2015 10:32, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
On 25/01/2015 14:45, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Right,
@Mani - How's your week placed? Let's see if we can get together to
make
https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK/job/openjdk-1.9-linux-x86_64/
produce some results.
@Rory - I've made a few changes to the Cloudbees CI build farm, would
it be
possible to enhance
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quality+Outreach page so
that it has:
1.) A link to the Quality Outreach section of the build farm (
https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Quality%20Outreach/)
2.) It lists OpenJDK being built nightly (listed here:
https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK)
3.) Lists the OpenJDK code tools being built nightly (listed here:
https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK%20code-tools/)
Done - listed you as maintainer, should I have said London JUGs ?
Rgds,Rory
Martijn - it appears I over stepped the mark.
The OpenJDK Bylaws are very clear [4] on what an OpenJDK Group can and
can not do:
"Groups may have web content and one or more mailing lists. Groups do
not have code
repositories of their own" so accordingly Groups' don't have build
farms, etc.
[4] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#_4
I have removed the links, let's discuss other options at FOSDEM .
Rgds,Rory
Also, I'm not sure if we should reach out to code-tools, jdk9-dev and
jdk8u-dev and ask them to have links to the CI farm as well? I think it
would be a good idea to highlight this though.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 25 January 2015 at 14:15, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Looks like I'm going now :-) - we can discuss further then, in the mean
time Mani and I will try to get something up and running on the
CloudBees
CI instances.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 19 January 2015 at 17:34, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Sadly I may not be able to make FOSDEM, still trying to wrangle some
clever ways to make it.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 19 January 2015 at 17:33, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com>
wrote:
On 19/01/2015 17:28, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi Rory,
Understood - it will be good to be able to encourage various
OpenJDK
members to contribute / port tests into it and measure that. Small
steps
:-).
Sounds good Martijn, talk more on this at FOSDEM ?
Rgds,Rory
On 19 January 2015 at 16:35, Rory O'Donnell
<rory.odonn...@oracle.com>
wrote:
On 19/01/2015 15:36, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi Rory,
Thanks - we're looking into the existing Cloudbees Jenkins
instance
to do this.
ok
A second question quick question - do the numbers we're publishing
look right compared to your internal ones?
Appreciate non OpenJDK tests run by Oracle means that they cover
more.
Comparing our internal numbers with yours would be like comparing
apples with pears
I'm afraid.
Rgds,Rory
Cheers,
Martijn
On 19 January 2015 at 15:18, Rory O'Donnell
<rory.odonn...@oracle.com>
wrote:
On 19/01/2015 10:55, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,
John Oliver and Mani Sarkar spent some time on the most recent
Adopt
OpenJDK hackday and managed to get what looks like to be
meaningful code
coverage numbers for OpenJDK using the jcov/jtreg tools:
Results for jdk9: http://sticky.uwcs.co.uk/jcov/
========Code Tools Dev========
The configuration John used was as follows (is this the correct
usage
pattern?):
Build jdk images
install jtreg with the jcov
export the normal vars:
```
export SOURCE_CODE=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/
export JTREG_INSTALL=/home/joliver/workspace/jtreg
export JT_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL
export JTREG_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL
export
PRODUCT_HOME=$SOURCE_CODE/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/images/jdk
export JPRT_JTREG_HOME=${JT_HOME}
export JPRT_JAVA_HOME=${PRODUCT_HOME}
export JTREG_TIMEOUT_FACTOR=5
export CONCURRENCY=8
```
cd into jdk/test
edit the Makefile and add the following:
```
jdkroot=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/
JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS +=
-jcov/classes:$(jdkroot)/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk/modules/java.base
JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS +=
-jcov/source:$(jdkroot)/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes
JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += -jcov/include:*
```
just before the line: # Make sure jtreg exists
then just run "make test" inside the root
=======Quality Discuss=======
Hi Martijn,
Posting the results on our wiki won't work, so I can provide a
link to
the
results. Let me know when you have decided on the link locations.
Rgds,Rory
Is this something that could be hosted by the quality group for
the
major OpenJDK code lines (7u, 8u and jdk9)?
If not then the Adoption Group can host it on one of their
external
servers temporarily and we could link to that from the
wiki(s)/project
page(s).
Cheers,
Martijn
--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
