Hi Rory, I think Adoption Group would be best, thanks!
Cheers, Martijn On 26 January 2015 at 10:32, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 25/01/2015 14:45, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> Right, >> >> @Mani - How's your week placed? Let's see if we can get together to make >> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK/ >> job/openjdk-1.9-linux-x86_64/ >> produce some results. >> >> @Rory - I've made a few changes to the Cloudbees CI build farm, would it >> be >> possible to enhance >> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quality+Outreach page so >> that it has: >> >> 1.) A link to the Quality Outreach section of the build farm ( >> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Quality%20Outreach/) >> >> 2.) It lists OpenJDK being built nightly (listed here: >> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK) >> >> 3.) Lists the OpenJDK code tools being built nightly (listed here: >> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK%20code-tools/) >> > Done - listed you as maintainer, should I have said London JUGs ? > > Rgds,Rory > > >> Also, I'm not sure if we should reach out to code-tools, jdk9-dev and >> jdk8u-dev and ask them to have links to the CI farm as well? I think it >> would be a good idea to highlight this though. >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> On 25 January 2015 at 14:15, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Looks like I'm going now :-) - we can discuss further then, in the mean >>> time Mani and I will try to get something up and running on the CloudBees >>> CI instances. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 19 January 2015 at 17:34, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Sadly I may not be able to make FOSDEM, still trying to wrangle some >>>> clever ways to make it. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> On 19 January 2015 at 17:33, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 19/01/2015 17:28, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Rory, >>>>> >>>>> Understood - it will be good to be able to encourage various OpenJDK >>>>> members to contribute / port tests into it and measure that. Small >>>>> steps >>>>> :-). >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good Martijn, talk more on this at FOSDEM ? >>>>> >>>>> Rgds,Rory >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 19 January 2015 at 16:35, Rory O'Donnell < >>>>> rory.odonn...@oracle.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 19/01/2015 15:36, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Rory, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks - we're looking into the existing Cloudbees Jenkins instance >>>>>> to do this. >>>>>> >>>>>> ok >>>>>> >>>>>> A second question quick question - do the numbers we're publishing >>>>>> look right compared to your internal ones? >>>>>> >>>>>> Appreciate non OpenJDK tests run by Oracle means that they cover >>>>>> more. >>>>>> >>>>>> Comparing our internal numbers with yours would be like comparing >>>>>> apples with pears >>>>>> I'm afraid. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rgds,Rory >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Martijn >>>>>> >>>>>> On 19 January 2015 at 15:18, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 19/01/2015 10:55, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> John Oliver and Mani Sarkar spent some time on the most recent Adopt >>>>>>>> OpenJDK hackday and managed to get what looks like to be meaningful >>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>> coverage numbers for OpenJDK using the jcov/jtreg tools: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Results for jdk9: http://sticky.uwcs.co.uk/jcov/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ========Code Tools Dev======== >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The configuration John used was as follows (is this the correct >>>>>>>> usage >>>>>>>> pattern?): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Build jdk images >>>>>>>> install jtreg with the jcov >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> export the normal vars: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>> export SOURCE_CODE=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/ >>>>>>>> export JTREG_INSTALL=/home/joliver/workspace/jtreg >>>>>>>> export JT_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL >>>>>>>> export JTREG_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL >>>>>>>> export >>>>>>>> PRODUCT_HOME=$SOURCE_CODE/build/linux-x86_64-normal- >>>>>>>> server-release/images/jdk >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> export JPRT_JTREG_HOME=${JT_HOME} >>>>>>>> export JPRT_JAVA_HOME=${PRODUCT_HOME} >>>>>>>> export JTREG_TIMEOUT_FACTOR=5 >>>>>>>> export CONCURRENCY=8 >>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cd into jdk/test >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> edit the Makefile and add the following: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>> jdkroot=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += >>>>>>>> -jcov/classes:$(jdkroot)/build/linux-x86_64-normal- >>>>>>>> server-release/jdk/modules/java.base >>>>>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += >>>>>>>> -jcov/source:$(jdkroot)/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes >>>>>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += -jcov/include:* >>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> just before the line: # Make sure jtreg exists >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> then just run "make test" inside the root >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =======Quality Discuss======= >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Martijn, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Posting the results on our wiki won't work, so I can provide a link >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> results. Let me know when you have decided on the link locations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rgds,Rory >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this something that could be hosted by the quality group for the >>>>>>>> major OpenJDK code lines (7u, 8u and jdk9)? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If not then the Adoption Group can host it on one of their external >>>>>>>> servers temporarily and we could link to that from the >>>>>>>> wiki(s)/project >>>>>>>> page(s). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Martijn >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>>>>>> Quality Engineering Manager >>>>>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>>>>> Quality Engineering Manager >>>>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>>>> Quality Engineering Manager >>>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > >
