Right, @Mani - How's your week placed? Let's see if we can get together to make https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK/job/openjdk-1.9-linux-x86_64/ produce some results.
@Rory - I've made a few changes to the Cloudbees CI build farm, would it be possible to enhance https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quality+Outreach page so that it has: 1.) A link to the Quality Outreach section of the build farm ( https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Quality%20Outreach/) 2.) It lists OpenJDK being built nightly (listed here: https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK) 3.) Lists the OpenJDK code tools being built nightly (listed here: https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/view/OpenJDK%20code-tools/) Also, I'm not sure if we should reach out to code-tools, jdk9-dev and jdk8u-dev and ask them to have links to the CI farm as well? I think it would be a good idea to highlight this though. Cheers, Martijn On 25 January 2015 at 14:15, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like I'm going now :-) - we can discuss further then, in the mean > time Mani and I will try to get something up and running on the CloudBees > CI instances. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 19 January 2015 at 17:34, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Sadly I may not be able to make FOSDEM, still trying to wrangle some >> clever ways to make it. >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> On 19 January 2015 at 17:33, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 19/01/2015 17:28, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rory, >>> >>> Understood - it will be good to be able to encourage various OpenJDK >>> members to contribute / port tests into it and measure that. Small steps >>> :-). >>> >>> Sounds good Martijn, talk more on this at FOSDEM ? >>> >>> Rgds,Rory >>> >>> >>> On 19 January 2015 at 16:35, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 19/01/2015 15:36, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Rory, >>>> >>>> Thanks - we're looking into the existing Cloudbees Jenkins instance >>>> to do this. >>>> >>>> ok >>>> >>>> A second question quick question - do the numbers we're publishing >>>> look right compared to your internal ones? >>>> >>>> Appreciate non OpenJDK tests run by Oracle means that they cover >>>> more. >>>> >>>> Comparing our internal numbers with yours would be like comparing >>>> apples with pears >>>> I'm afraid. >>>> >>>> Rgds,Rory >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> On 19 January 2015 at 15:18, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 19/01/2015 10:55, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> John Oliver and Mani Sarkar spent some time on the most recent Adopt >>>>>> OpenJDK hackday and managed to get what looks like to be meaningful code >>>>>> coverage numbers for OpenJDK using the jcov/jtreg tools: >>>>>> >>>>>> Results for jdk9: http://sticky.uwcs.co.uk/jcov/ >>>>>> >>>>>> ========Code Tools Dev======== >>>>>> >>>>>> The configuration John used was as follows (is this the correct usage >>>>>> pattern?): >>>>>> >>>>>> Build jdk images >>>>>> install jtreg with the jcov >>>>>> >>>>>> export the normal vars: >>>>>> >>>>>> ``` >>>>>> export SOURCE_CODE=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/ >>>>>> export JTREG_INSTALL=/home/joliver/workspace/jtreg >>>>>> export JT_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL >>>>>> export JTREG_HOME=$JTREG_INSTALL >>>>>> export >>>>>> PRODUCT_HOME=$SOURCE_CODE/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/images/jdk >>>>>> >>>>>> export JPRT_JTREG_HOME=${JT_HOME} >>>>>> export JPRT_JAVA_HOME=${PRODUCT_HOME} >>>>>> export JTREG_TIMEOUT_FACTOR=5 >>>>>> export CONCURRENCY=8 >>>>>> ``` >>>>>> >>>>>> cd into jdk/test >>>>>> >>>>>> edit the Makefile and add the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> ``` >>>>>> jdkroot=/home/joliver/workspace/jdk9/ >>>>>> >>>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += >>>>>> -jcov/classes:$(jdkroot)/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk/modules/java.base >>>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += >>>>>> -jcov/source:$(jdkroot)/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes >>>>>> JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS += -jcov/include:* >>>>>> ``` >>>>>> >>>>>> just before the line: # Make sure jtreg exists >>>>>> >>>>>> then just run "make test" inside the root >>>>>> >>>>>> =======Quality Discuss======= >>>>>> >>>>> Hi Martijn, >>>>> >>>>> Posting the results on our wiki won't work, so I can provide a link to >>>>> the >>>>> results. Let me know when you have decided on the link locations. >>>>> >>>>> Rgds,Rory >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this something that could be hosted by the quality group for the >>>>>> major OpenJDK code lines (7u, 8u and jdk9)? >>>>>> >>>>>> If not then the Adoption Group can host it on one of their external >>>>>> servers temporarily and we could link to that from the wiki(s)/project >>>>>> page(s). >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Martijn >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>>>> Quality Engineering Manager >>>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>>> Quality Engineering Manager >>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>> Quality Engineering Manager >>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>> >>> >> >
