Just incase anyone else is thinking of contacting Vulcan, I dropped Mike an
email last night to check if he’s still doing CVH work:

 

 

 

  _____  

From: Mike Tanski
Sent: 22 October 2008 07:55
To: Andy Haworth
Subject: Re: CVH Turbo

 

Hi Andy,

 

Thank you for your e-mail.

 

Because of my CNC machining commitments I cannot help with any engine work
at present - but Steve at Vulcan Engineering should be able to.  Steve can
be reached on 0208 579 3202 or link here http://www.vulcanengines.com/  ,
please mention my name if you speak with him.

 

All the best,


Mike Tanski
Ferriday Engineering
www.ferriday.co.uk
01559 372143

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Matthew
Sent: 21 October 2008 22:24
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: 2+2 engine options

 

You mentioned you didn't fancy doing the zetec engine due to frame mods...
However if you've a turbo frame already then you could do what Mark did to
fit the Zetec into his saloon (pulleys are the same as ZVH).  You'd be doing
those on a ZVH anyway I think.  Guess it depends how much you want a turbo
motor.

 

Odd Mike told you to talk to Vulcan!  Still be interested to see one of his
1800 turbo engines going though.  Maybe he doesn't want to do CVH anymore
for some reason.  (I got zetec parts from him)

 

Matthew

 

 

 

 

 


  _____  


From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andy Haworth
Sent: 21 October 2008 22:16
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: 2+2 engine options

Just standard FRST breathers on mine, replaced the pot and pipework and it
was still doing it, so it was pointing at rings really as the old block was
fairly high miles

 

I'm probably going to go down the more conventional route of another CVH if
I can re-use the old block with the new crank, pistons, rods etc. If not,
then I'm likely looking at a ZVH turbo conversion, I've picked up a lead for
someone who's happy to convert and fit and has done it to his own car as
well, which is a glimmer of hope.

 

I talked to Mike at Ferriday a while ago, and he gave me Vulcan's number...?
Make of that what you will! 

 

TonyV - thanks for jumping in with the offer, but I'd need to drill a CPS
hole and rebuild which puts me roughly where I am now. To be fair I'm
probably looking at new build for this car,and it's more of an urgent
requirement. I am looking at another project 2+2 though, so let me know when
you do get around to your engine swap and there could be a deal to be done
on the lot

 

 

Andy

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Blackbird engine, I'd say no.  You have to really rev bike engines to get
decent torque figures, and it only gets to 90.4 ft/lbs anyway, so not all
that good in a 900 KG car.  You need to keep them revving high so you get
poor fuel economy, although that might not be a concern.

 

I assume you'd use the bike gear box, which has no reverse gear, so you need
to add one of those unless you fancy pushing it instead.  The bike boys out
in Ireland this year seemed to find it a pain in 400KG cars

 

My personal dealings with Specialised Engines would recommend you *not* to
go there.

 

How about talking to Mike Tanski?  He's the guy at Ferriday engineering.
Seems a genuine and nice enough guy.  Quite a few people have got CVH
engines from him.  How about a nice 1.8 CVH turbo?  Take a look at his
website here :-

http://www.ferriday.co.uk/performance/cvh.shtml

 

Out of interest what was your breather setup?  I had a few troubles with the
Zetec Turbo blowing oil out at first until I modified the breathers for the
turbo application.

 

Matthew

 

 

 

 


  _____  


From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andy Haworth
Sent: 21 October 2008 19:17
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Quantum Owners] 2+2 engine options

I'm at a crossroads with the 2+2 at the moment. I'd done a FRST conversion
and blew the oil cap off a couple of times after cleaning the breathers. A
compression test wasnt possible as there was a spark plug cross threaded

 

So that led me to getting a head reconditioned, and if a new head was going
on, may as well get a new (rebuilt) CVH block too as the rings were suspect.

 

After skimming the new block, rebuilding it, finding the crank was stiff,
having that reground and everything built back up again we then find out the
block's cracked. So, I'm hoping the old engine hasnt been rebored, that we
can do that to +.5mm, and fit all the "new" stuff into the old block, refit
to the car and away we go. If the old engine has been rebored, there's not a
lot around for +1mm pistons and I'd need to start thinking about something
else.

 

I dont really want to go full Zetec (too much chopping and the subframes are
expensive). Not keen on an ebay CVH and not really having the £2k kicking
around to give to Specialised Engines has left me in a bit of a predicament.
No-one locally seems to want to get involved in a ZVH turbo even if
everything's provided. 

 

In the middle of the conversation, one of the engine guys casually dropped
in that he'd be able to spec an 1100 Blackbird engine as an option. I'd have
thought a 2+2 is a bit heavy for this - anyone considered it a bit more
seriously than my fag packet calculations?

 

 

TIA

 

 

Andy

<br


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners 
Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the 
preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or 
entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to