On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 7:59:35 AM UTC-4, awokd wrote: > [email protected]: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Restarting this thread from the Github issue. > > > > I too am a fan of the KVM approach. > > > > I strongly support applying for the Open Tech Fund. The next deadline is > > November 1st, 2018. Personally, I think this is an incredibly high > > priority project. It is near impossible to keep systems secure without > > running Qubes OS, yet there is no secure platform you can yet run it on. > > TalosII, on the open Power Architecture, is the answer to this, as it is > > the only system with open and auditable schematics and firmware. > > Currently, we have to choose between running Qubes on backdoored systems, > > or running open systems with operating systems that can be taken down by a > > single vulnerability in the browser. > > > > I am more than glad to help start writing this. Does anyone have previous > > experience with this? > > The thread I linked in > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4318 > (https://groups.google.com/d/msg/qubes-devel/IFLyyCUbLmQ/_HtgOJK4AQAJ) > has Marek also mention KVM. No experience here, but adding the missing > pieces to KVM seemed the hardest step. I'd like to see Qubes running on > an open architecture as well, and am willing to help.
I meant experience in regards to applying to the OTF fund actually. Since we are already on the Google platform, would a google doc be a good place to start this for collaborative work? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/0d21e6d4-0803-48fe-b5a8-d899be651091%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
