On 11/13/2016 07:39 PM, entr0py wrote:
- All intel computers from around 2006+ have ME, not just the ones with
vPro (which again is just a marketing term for the business level remote
They are a shitty company and you shouldn't support them anyway. (ME,
outsoucing/h1b abuses, general anti-foss attitude)
VT-d is intels marketing term for IOMMU, you can buy an AMD system
that has IOMMU (AMD-Vi) (but not FM2/AM4 as that has PSP). Qubes
needs IOMMU not "VT-d"
Thanks for reply. I understood this previously but I'm not familiar with AMD's
offerings and didn't realize they had a current lineup that fits this category.
It also seems that Skylake i3's have IOMMU without vPro.
You can use a VMM with a pfsense VM and separate driver domains for
the network interfaces, qubes isn't a router operating system...
Is there an inherent reason that Qubes should not be used as a router?
- I really don't know how to reply to this
x86/wintel is only a small subsection of the computing world, you can
buy for instance an IBM OPOWER8 workstation or the Tyan Palmetto
(also OPOWER8) - they have open source firmware and no ME type stuff.
- OPOWER has an IOMMU equivalent.
The newish and readily available blob free x86 amd boards are high
performance level (kgpe-d16) I don't know what your connection is
like so if you want something lower power you could go with a
coreboot board with the features you want and simply not include the
blobs (which could mean no video, no fan control and no USB3 - but
none of those are needed on a passively cooled router anyways and you
can install/control via serial)
There is the apu2 from pcengines, which has no blobs (AFIAK, ask
them) although it doesn't have an IOMMU.
Small subsection? I guess I need to get out and see more of the computing
world. Thanks for the suggestions. I'll do some reading!
I find it ironic that you apparently value your privacy but you are
using gmail - if you do not pay for a service YOU are the product.
Yes, and that maxim applies to every website you visit that doesn't cost you any money.
Everyone uses Google. Just because there's no "g" in the url doesn't mean that
you're free of Google's tentacles (and fingerprinting).
Yes, I use this gmail address to access groups.google.com and nothing else, in
a dedicated vm, over Tor. But you are correct - a non-gmail address, in a
dedicated vm, over Tor would be considerably better. But I fail to see the
irony. This pseudonym has long-ago broadcast several hundred words onto the
Internet so it would be naive to think that it's still an anonymous identity.
The stylometry is out there for anyone that wants to look. The distinction is
that I have other pseudonyms that aren't quite so vociferous. :) Of course,
Google probably has them all linked already anyway...
- I use request policy and thus I don't load any of their services soooo.
I hear excuses - It is very lazy of you not to simply get another
service, either paid or free.
there are actually one or two unicorn email providers out there that
don't do gmail style abuses, but the storage limits are realistic (300MB
or so) and you exist to get their name out in to the world and thus
promote their *paid* business email offerings. It costs them next to
nothing to provide an account like that and then it results in people
singing their praises = more business.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.