On 04/12/2018 09:21 AM, Steve Coleman wrote: > On 04/12/18 05:32, Jo wrote: >> My suggestion would be the Turris Omnia. Im using it myself in >> various cases and im very happy with it. > > I second this opinion. Its Open Source (OpenWrt), downloads its own > patches to keep up with any security issues or exploits in the wild. > Unless of course you choose to be paranoid enough to do your own > builds/patches. It is not open source because it does not have libre firmware nor actual schematics.
I can't believe peoples standards have fallen so far down that simply letting you run linux and publishing the board diagram is considered "open source hardware" On 04/12/2018 02:04 AM, Giulio wrote: > In my opinion the best affordable option is using a PC Engines APU2 with > OpenBSD https://www.pcengines.ch/apu2.htm (but of couse you can use > linux/FreeBSD too). The APU2 has AMD PSP so I would not get it, whereas the APU1 doesn't. On 04/12/2018 02:01 AM, 799 wrote: > having a reasonable secure OS and maybe some additional freedom by using > Coreboot is great, but might not be enough. I would use a KCMA-D8 running a libre version of coreboot and OPNSense. It has two quality onboard nics and various pci-e slots. pfsense is now controlled by an evil corporation that is forcing undesired changes and privacy violations on people such as: * Mandating AES-NI to arbitrary make older computers not work with it, to try and encourage people to buy their pre-built routers. * Adding a phone home function that sends your serial numbers and various data to rubicon communications - this setting is on by default and for some reason turns back on randomly. * Ignoring basic security concepts such as signed updates and .isos because "we have a hash hosted on two separate servers" and insulting me when I protested. * Insulting their competitors by making a website full of lies, nazi images and porn clipart. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPNsense https://opnsense.org/opnsense-com/ "In November 2017, a World Intellectual Property Organization panel found that Netgate, the copyright owner of pfSense, had been using the domain opnsense.com in bad faith to discredit OPNsense, and obligated Netgate to transfer the domain to Deciso. The Netgate party tried to invoke the fair use clause and claimed that the domain name "has been used for a parody website"; it was rejected on the basis that free speech does not cover registration of domain names.[6]" Does that sound like a trustworthy company lead by mature individuals? I suggest the use of OPNSense instead of pfsense - the founder of pfsense has not been in control of the project for a long time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/7171dd4b-f7b8-3e65-b775-6e49fa5830f3%40gmx.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0xDF372A17.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
