On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:14 AM, David Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maxime louvel wrote: > > > Unless if the GPS allow my server to be more stable and thus I can assume > to > > get a better synchronisation... > > Firstly, I got two threads confused, so some of my comments weren't > based on your situation. In particular, the unsynchronised DCF system > relates to the other thread. > No pb ;) > > A node synchronized to GPS *with PPS* will be much more stable than a > system that is free-running or synchronised by other typical means. > Ok , thus I should have a better accuracy for the nodes synchronised to this server than for the nodes synchronised to server itself synchronised through internet to a stratum 2. But that still doesn't solve the problem I encounter in my subnet, does it ? If no, the only solution would be that each node gets a PPS signal via its serial line ?? thanks > > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions > -- Maxime Louvel 0044 7964 5555 80 43 Allen road Whitemore reans WV60AW Wolverhampton United Kingdom _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
