[EMAIL PROTECTED] (maxime louvel) writes: >On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:14 AM, David Woolley ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> A node synchronized to GPS *with PPS* will be much more stable than a >> system that is free-running or synchronised by other typical means. >> >Ok , thus I should have a better accuracy for the nodes synchronised to >this server than for the nodes synchronised to server itself synchronised >through internet to a stratum 2. >But that still doesn't solve the problem I encounter in my subnet, does it ? >If no, the only solution would be that each node gets a PPS signal via its >serial line ?? As I said, I have no idea why your jitter is so large. I get about 10us The network cards are standard run of the mill ( and various) network cards. The switches are Cisco gigabit switches. I do use chrony, rather than ntp. You may wnat to make sure that your ntp run at high priority >thanks >> >> _______________________________________________ >> questions mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions >> >-- >Maxime Louvel >0044 7964 5555 80 >43 Allen road >Whitemore reans >WV60AW Wolverhampton >United Kingdom _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
