David Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >maxime louvel wrote:
>> Unless if the GPS allow my server to be more stable and thus I can assume to >> get a better synchronisation... >Firstly, I got two threads confused, so some of my comments weren't >based on your situation. In particular, the unsynchronised DCF system >relates to the other thread. >A node synchronized to GPS *with PPS* will be much more stable than a >system that is free-running or synchronised by other typical means. I do not know that it is more stable. It does keep better time. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
