- I am running ntp at max priority (ntpd -N) - My nodes are real machines, not VM
- I haven't tried chrony yet, but I probably will. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (maxime louvel) writes: > > >On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:14 AM, David Woolley > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> A node synchronized to GPS *with PPS* will be much more stable than a > >> system that is free-running or synchronised by other typical means. > >> > > >Ok , thus I should have a better accuracy for the nodes synchronised to > >this server than for the nodes synchronised to server itself synchronised > >through internet to a stratum 2. > >But that still doesn't solve the problem I encounter in my subnet, does it > ? > > >If no, the only solution would be that each node gets a PPS signal via its > >serial line ?? > > As I said, I have no idea why your jitter is so large. I get about 10us The > network cards are standard run of the mill ( and various) network cards. > The switches are Cisco gigabit switches. > I do use chrony, rather than ntp. > You may wnat to make sure that your ntp run at high priority > > > > >thanks > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> questions mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions > >> > > > > >-- > >Maxime Louvel > >0044 7964 5555 80 > >43 Allen road > >Whitemore reans > >WV60AW Wolverhampton > >United Kingdom > > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions > -- Maxime Louvel 0044 7964 5555 80 43 Allen road Whitemore reans WV60AW Wolverhampton United Kingdom _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
