On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:00 PM, David Taylor <david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> wrote: > I would have supported that, partially because I like the chap & what he > does, but their server didn't support any of the standard NTP management > commands last time I looked....
I did talk to him about doing authenticated connections and there are some new features in the new appliance. And of course the code and designs are open so people could run with it. I think the only real issue is no on-board packet filter so it can't block connections. The previous version let you monitor the GPS data stream and I monitor time performance indirectly e.g. using ntpdate. Since it doesn't actually run NTP typical NTP status and management is irrelevant. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
