Martin Burnicki writes: > Rob wrote: > > Martin Burnicki <martin.burni...@meinberg.de> wrote: > >> And of course, the information flow was really bad here, so that it is > >> very hard to figure out which systems are affected. > > > > Indeed. Only after 3 days there was a statement on the pool mailing list > > that the problem only affected servers that can be queried. Well, that > > had better be stated in the original release, so that 99.9% of the users > > of ntpd could immediately move it to "not for me" and not be worried. > > Yes. I agree that this information should have been available > immediately with the first alert. This would have avoided much trouble.
And if we had realized all of this at first alert we would have. The announcement came out 3 days' later than I wanted. I'd been working on this for 2 solid weeks by then. -- Harlan Stenn <st...@ntp.org> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions