Harlan Stenn <st...@ntp.org> wrote: > Martin Burnicki writes: >> Rob wrote: >> > Martin Burnicki <martin.burni...@meinberg.de> wrote: >> >> And of course, the information flow was really bad here, so that it is >> >> very hard to figure out which systems are affected. >> > >> > Indeed. Only after 3 days there was a statement on the pool mailing list >> > that the problem only affected servers that can be queried. Well, that >> > had better be stated in the original release, so that 99.9% of the users >> > of ntpd could immediately move it to "not for me" and not be worried. >> >> Yes. I agree that this information should have been available >> immediately with the first alert. This would have avoided much trouble. > > And if we had realized all of this at first alert we would have. > > The announcement came out 3 days' later than I wanted. I'd been working > on this for 2 solid weeks by then.
Yes, I agree it would be very convenient when you had insight in programming so you could work out things like that more efficiently. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions