Have you thought about also trying models that just treat this as a quantitative trait (for which you have crude data), under the presumption that evolution occurs along the scale of 0 -> 1 > 2 or backwards? Cheers, Ted
Theodore Garland, Jr., Distinguished Professor Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology (EEOB) University of California, Riverside Riverside, CA 92521 Office Phone: (951) 827-3524 Facsimile: (951) 827-4286 (not confidential) Email: [email protected] http://www.biology.ucr.edu/people/faculty/Garland.html http://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=iSSbrhwAAAAJ Director, UCR Institute for the Development of <http://idea.ucr.edu/>Educational Applications <http://idea.ucr.edu/> Editor in Chief, *Physiological and Biochemical Zoology <http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/journals/journal/pbz.html>* Fail Lab: Episode One *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0msBWyTzU0 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0msBWyTzU0>* On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Andrea Soriano <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I am performing a phylogenetic 3-category ordinal probit MCMCglmm model, 0 > (non-migratory), 1 (partial migrants), 2 (full migrants). I was wondering > whether you could advise me on which sort of posthoc analysis could I do to > see whether there are differences between each one of the groups (0 vs 1, 0 > vs 2, 1 vs 2). Thanks a lot for your help. > > Kind regards, > Andrea > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > R-sig-phylo mailing list - [email protected] > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo > Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r- > [email protected]/ > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-sig-phylo mailing list - [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
