Dear Karla, I think the question was discussed on this list some years ago but I don't remember the details -- a search in the archives could help you.
Surely, 'sex' is not a (species-level) evolving trait. Maybe try to analyse 'sexual dimorphism' if the trait is present in both sexes. If the trait is present in only one sex (e.g., antler size), I think a good approach would be to analyse males/females separately. Best, Emmanuel ----- Le 21 Mai 25, à 21:14, Karla Shikev [email protected] a écrit : > Dear all, > > I'm trying to do an analysis that is a bit unusual and I'd appreciate any > feedback. I'm looking at correlates of body size, but I want to analyze > males and females separately. However, a regular PGLS would only allow one > value per tip. I'd like something like this: > > body size ~ correlate1 + correlate2 + sex > > Any suggestions? > > Karla > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > R-sig-phylo mailing list - [email protected] > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo > Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ _______________________________________________ R-sig-phylo mailing list - [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
