"R. Kent Dybvig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So you directly contradicted yourself from one note to the next.
I missed that, obviously. Could you clarify? > I've read that section several times without getting much out of it, but > nothing I see there applies to the parameter mechanism. Don't Chez's parameters provide the kind of thread-local storage the paper talks about? (I'm really not sure at this point.) > To replace parameters with your restricted construct, one need only > define your value-binding construct in terms of parameters and use > it in place of parameters. That's not enough for your particular API, as you can't take away mutation from an existing, provided parameter. > Okay, but where's the definition of parameterize in terms of your > dynamic binding construct? It didn't make it into your note. I was assuming I'd use your definition unchanged. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
