> As dynamic binding can be implemented in > terms of `dynamic-wind' anyway, I don't see how this is relevant.
It's only relevant in that your claim was bogus. > What I'm interested in, however, it whether my implementation is > faithful to your semantics. Is it? Well, it's my code, so yes I guess it is. Kent _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
