John Cowan <[email protected]> writes: > Jim Wise scripsit: > >> I'd be willing to cull the list discussion as a proposal, if there seems >> to be a common thread. Are there any details on what's wanted in such a >> proposal? Or just the discussion on the list? Any standard formatting? > > Take a look at http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/ArraysCowan for a sample. > The markup is ''...'' for italics and `...` for monowidth font. An > example should be preceded by a line containing just {{{, and followed > by a line containing just }}}. But if this is too much trouble, I can > insert the markup later.
Okay, I've begun putting this together. For reference, I'm looking at:
* the thread so far on in this list and the wg* lists
* the pattern matching implementations provided with Bigloo, Chicken
Scheme, and Racket
* R6RS case and syntax-case
* the platform-independent pattern matching library described by
Andrew K. Wright and Bruce F. Duba in the paper ``Pattern Matching
for Scheme''
* Common Lisp's DESTRUCTURING-BIND macro
what else should I be looking at? What other scheme implementations
provide pattern matching support?
Thanks,
--
Jim Wise
[email protected]
pgpIn2bSoKLqP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
