Per Bothner scripsit: > Cute. But there seems to be a mistake in the definitions of lambda > and lambda* - they have the same definitions and expansions in terms > of core:lambda.
No, the former is defined as (core:lambda (id) ...) and the latter as (core:lambda id ...). The names may well be reversed, but I'll wait for the author to weigh in on that. -- John Cowan co...@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan And now here I was, in a country where a right to say how the country should be governed was restricted to six persons in each thousand of its population. For the nine hundred and ninety-four to express dissatisfaction with the regnant system and propose to change it, would have made the whole six shudder as one man, it would have been so disloyal, so dishonorable, such putrid black treason. --Mark Twain's Connecticut Yankee _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
