On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:

> What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these 
> days,
> specially debugging wise.

Really? We've got most of what paredit offers, including mapping raw left-paren 
to matched-pair (this option is currently called "automatic parentheses"). 
Glancing over the cheat-sheet, it looks like the only major change would be the 
fact that right-paren is not mapped to jump-outward; instead, I just use the 
right arrow for that (when there are intervening chars, I  use opt-up 
opt-right).

Are there other things that paredit gives you?

Just curious,

John Clements


> 
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Ray Racine <ray.rac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> FWIW, I've used the high quality Quack and then the glorious Geiser for
>> several years.  During this same period, on occasion I'd give DR a trial
>> only to quickly retreat.  That is no longer the case as of several months
>> ago.  I've switched solely to DR and haven't mulled for a moment about
>> reversing.  If configured just so with the addition of a couple of custom
>> key-bindings, it rocks.  Of course one's IDE selection is very personal and
>> YMMV.
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________
>>  Racket Users list:
>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Eduardo Bellani
> 
> "Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed."
> ____________________
>  Racket Users list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to