On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan > <vu3...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John Clements >> <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote: >>> >>>> What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these >>>> days, >>>> specially debugging wise. >>> >>> Really? We've got most of what paredit offers, including mapping raw >>> left-paren to matched-pair (this option is currently called "automatic >>> parentheses"). Glancing over the cheat-sheet, it looks like the only major >>> change would be the fact that right-paren is not mapped to jump-outward; >>> instead, I just use the right arrow for that (when there are intervening >>> chars, I use opt-up opt-right). >>> >>> Are there other things that paredit gives you? >> >> My main gripe with DrRacket's automatic parentheses is the removal. >> When, say, the left paren is removed, the right one remains. Paredit > > I should have written more clearly here. What I meant by the above > statement is that, if I occasionally put a left paren, it inserts the > right paren as well and now if I immediately remove the right paren, > then the right paren remains.
Are you removing the open paren with a backspace, or with an undo? In the first case, I have nothing to offer. In the second case, I think this is something that could be / should be fixed. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
