Paredit is more structured than what I can get out of emacs. It does not allow me to get my sexps unbalanced. For instance, to close and align all the parens I just go on pressing ')' until I hit the end of the function I'm working on.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Ray Racine <ray.rac...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've enabled auto parens and square with highlight et al in DR and use the > sexp movement key combos and I'm pretty happy with it. I was never a heavy > user of paredit in emacs, though an admirer. > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani <ebell...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these >> days, >> specially debugging wise. >> >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Ray Racine <ray.rac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > FWIW, I've used the high quality Quack and then the glorious Geiser for >> > several years. During this same period, on occasion I'd give DR a trial >> > only to quickly retreat. That is no longer the case as of several >> > months >> > ago. I've switched solely to DR and haven't mulled for a moment about >> > reversing. If configured just so with the addition of a couple of >> > custom >> > key-bindings, it rocks. Of course one's IDE selection is very personal >> > and >> > YMMV. >> > >> > >> > ____________________ >> > Racket Users list: >> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Eduardo Bellani >> >> "Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed." > > -- Eduardo Bellani "Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed." ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
