On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <vu3...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John Clements > <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >> >> On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote: >> >>> What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these >>> days, >>> specially debugging wise. >> >> Really? We've got most of what paredit offers, including mapping raw >> left-paren to matched-pair (this option is currently called "automatic >> parentheses"). Glancing over the cheat-sheet, it looks like the only major >> change would be the fact that right-paren is not mapped to jump-outward; >> instead, I just use the right arrow for that (when there are intervening >> chars, I use opt-up opt-right). >> >> Are there other things that paredit gives you? > > My main gripe with DrRacket's automatic parentheses is the removal. > When, say, the left paren is removed, the right one remains. Paredit
I should have written more clearly here. What I meant by the above statement is that, if I occasionally put a left paren, it inserts the right paren as well and now if I immediately remove the right paren, then the right paren remains. -- Ramakrishnan ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
