On Aug 30, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > Eduardo Bellani wrote at 08/30/2012 06:00 PM: >> Paredit is more structured than what I can get out of emacs. It does >> not allow me >> to get my sexps unbalanced. For instance, to close and align all the >> parens I just go on pressing ')' until I >> hit the end of the function I'm working on. >> > > There was something called DivaScheme (Danny?) that seemed like DrScheme's > answer to paredit. > > Maybe someone wants to integrate it into the core, or advertise it, or > whatever.
My recollection is that DivaScheme wasn't well-integrated into the existing editor, and relied on re-parsing the input after each keystroke. I think that if you wanted something more like paredit, it might simply suffice to add bindings for the "closer" keys that mapped them to the search-for-end-of-sexp, though I do see (looking again at the paredit cheat-sheet) that the editor would have to distinguish whether or not it was in a comment. Come to think of it, I'm not sure how commenting-out works in paredit. What if I insert a semicolon that comments out several close parens, and no open parens? I would try it myself, but it looks like paredit is something that needs to be installed separately. FWIW, I'm working from this cheat sheet: http://emacswiki.org/emacs/PareditCheatsheet John > > Neil V. > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
